Tag Archives: peer review

Pippa Hawley is the Head of the Division of Palliative Care at the University of British Columbia


The recent headlines about legalization of cannabis in Canada - a subject already fraught with bias - has illustrated the need for care when reporting on statistical observations. An example of things going badly wrong is a recent Vancouver Sun column headline “Fatal car crashes triple among drivers high on marijuana after legalization in Colorado; double in Washington state”. This was based on an article in the October issue of the BCMJ. The headline would seem to indicate that there has been a dramatic increase in fatal car crashes in those two states caused by people driving high on newly-legal cannabis.

This would be very important information and a pretty persuasive argument against legalization of cannabis, if it were true. ...continue reading

DMacA_3Domhnall MacAuley is a CMAJ Associate Editor and a professor of primary care in Northern Ireland, UK.


I'm heading to Oxford, England, this week, to teach a session at the EQUATOR [Network's] Publication School. I'll be talking about what scientific editors do - and particularly about what they want - as well as what to do to ensure that you get your paper published. From writing a good submission letter, to responding well to peer reviewers' comments in a revision, it's important to pay attention to detail. Here's a brief video summary ...continue reading

Domhnall MacAuleyDomhnall MacAuley is a CMAJ Associate Editor and a professor of primary care in Northern Ireland, UK


Monday 28 September to Friday 2 October is “Peer Review Week".* This gives us an opportunity to thank those who do such a superb job in assessing, advising on, and enhancing the quality of academic work. We greatly appreciate the time and effort you invest on our behalf, on behalf of our authors and, on behalf of the patients who ultimately benefit from medical research and education. We could not do our jobs without you. ...continue reading

1 Comment

Gordon Giddings. Editorial Fellow, CMAJ.Gordon Giddings, is the outgoing CMAJ Editorial Fellow (2013-14)


It’s likely that you will hear many different responses from colleagues when you announce to them, after having been in practice for several years, that you are undertaking a medical editorial fellowship with CMAJ. Some of the responses that I received when I announced this to my palliative care colleagues were

“You’re gonna be a paper doctor!”

“Oh my goodness! I hope everything is okay.”

“Interesting. How much does it pay?”

Colleagues were not the only ones uncertain about this career step. When I explained to the CMPA rep what I would be doing for the year, they could not figure out what category of coverage to put me in, repeating “I’ve never heard of this. So you’re not going to be seeing patients there then?”

In fact I did continue to see patients on a semi-regular basis, but my full time job as an editorial fellow was based at the offices of the CMA in Ottawa. I commenced my fellowship just over one year ago. It was somewhat ironic, given that my least favorite aspect of residency was journal club. However in the years since that time, I came to develop a great respect for the medical literature, and to rely on it, not only in my clinical and academic roles but also in administrative ones. I also hoped to find a way to combine medicine and literature in my career, whatever that might lead to.

It was not surprising that my CMPA representative had not heard of the editorial fellowship. There were not even 10 fellows that had completed the CMAJ fellowship in its history, and only 3 or 4 other journals had a similar program (in fact, as the world of medical editing is relatively small, I would go on to become good friends with the current editorial fellows from the New England Journal and the British Medical Journal). It was certainly somewhat intimidating initially, given the combined international editorial, academic and clinical experience of the CMAJ editorial team. As well, many of the previous CMAJ fellows have gone on to very distinguished international careers that span editing, research and clinical medicine. Would I measure up? Would I be good enough?

One element that made my introduction to CMAJ a bit more relaxed was the fact that my fellowship supervisor, an experienced editor trained at the BMJ, had only arrived a few weeks before I had, and was similarly getting familiar with her new surroundings; however, we both quickly found our bearings. Within the first couple of months of the fellowship I was already a regular voting contributor at weekly research manuscript meetings, and had undertaken additional study in epidemiology at the University of Ottawa, with plans to attend several conferences throughout the year.

After the initial stint in the Research section for CMAJ and CMAJ Open, I rotated through the Practice, News, Humanities, Commentaries and Analyses sections before having a final ‘consolidative’ month where ‘anything was fair game’. In addition to this, I had the opportunity to contribute 2 editorials to the journal, which gave me some of my first experiences with physician advocacy in an international forum.

Though a visiting elective experience with the BMJ in February had to be cancelled (due to the arrival of my son), I feel as though I have received a world class education in the skills of critical appraisal and scientific writing. I am also very proud to have my CMAJ supervisors and colleagues as mentors and friends. I will be continuing with CMAJ in the role of Associate Editor, and I expect I will spend the next couple of years attempting to strike the right balance between editing and practice. I have a couple of exciting projects on the horizon in both editing and clinical medicine, and I realize that having undertaken this fellowship has given me additional confidence in both of these roles (in this era of evidence based medicine), as well as a desire to continue learning.

Next week, CMAJ welcomes its new editorial fellow, who will bring her own unique set of experiences and perspectives to the role, and I’ll take this opportunity to officially welcome her. I would also like to acknowledge CMAJ for being one of the few journals in the world to offer the experience of gaining the editorial skillset for both physicians just starting out and those already in mid-career phase. I encourage all physicians to continue to enhance their critical appraisal skills, not necessarily through editorial fellowships, but through courses, journal clubs (yes, I said it), opportunities to peer review, or through individual reading. Perhaps a good way to start would be by going to cmaj.ca and checking out the newest research article or commentary - or maybe acting as a contributor yourself.

As any editor worth his salt, I am conscious of my word limit. Regards and thanks to all for making this a year I will not soon forget.