Bader Alamri is an Internal Medicine Resident (R3) at Dalhousie University
Since 1978, more than 4,500 Saudi physicians and surgeons have been trained and have provided healthcare in Canada. These individuals have trained and practiced at many university hospitals across Canada over the past forty years, working within a very wide range of specialties—from general residency training to subspecialty fellowships, as well as very specific areas of research and clinical interest [1].
The Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons in Canada (RC) recently signed a Master Executive Agreement with the Saudi Commission for Health Specialties (SCFHS) to increase and improve the quality of training in Saudi Arabia, which reflects the long-standing relationship between the two parties [2]. In fact, the current SCFHS CEO is himself a Canadian-trained gastroenterologist at the University of British Columbia, and the current CEO of RC is a hematologist who established the first bone marrow transplant program in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
What most don’t know is that Saudis in Canada do not compete with Canadians for training positions, as their seats are not funded by the Canadian government. Only internationally funded trainees can apply to them. All costs (including a tuition fee of $100,000/year for each resident, salaries, and allowances) are paid by the sponsoring government (e.g., the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia).
Sadly, on August 3, 2018, a diplomatic dispute between the two governments resulted in a termination of all medical scholarships for Saudi trainees. These trainees have been asked to return to the Kingdom by the end of summer 2018. This decision will have an impact on healthcare in Canada, as approximately 1000 Saudi medical trainees will be leaving the system [3].
Despite the management crises in many university hospitals, great support has been provided to the affected residents—both Saudis and the Canadians who will have to work longer hours to cover the shortage. Some senior medical staff even took action and wrote letters to the leaders of both governments, urging them to find a solution that would allow Saudi trainees to complete their training. Other senior medical staff accepted the decision and started looking for opportunities for their trainees in the United States. Unsurprisingly, most universities and staff rushed to help the affected trainees.
Social media (in particular, Twitter) was filled with supportive comments. But not all tweets were positive. Some comments on twitter were hurtful and seemed ill-informed and racist.
Racism in medical education is very real. In a British study assessing the acceptance rate among applicants to medical schools, candidates from ethnic minorities were disadvantaged [4]. In 2005, Albertan residents reported intimidation or harassment approximately 50% of the time from their staff or nurses; although the focus in that study was on gender differences, ethnicity was the second perceived base of such behaviour against the residents [5]. However, most research on racism in medicine is directed toward physician-patient interactions rather than amongst healthcare providers themselves.
The current diplomatic dispute has revealed the beautiful side of Canadians, including the attitudes of medical staff to people in distress regardless of political conflicts. However, it has also uncovered ignorance and hidden racism in the medical education system, highlighted by the vulnerability of Saudi residents in the current situation. This should raise the question of fairness toward residents from different ethnic minorities, and whether there have been cases of discrimination that were missed in our medical education system. Medical education organizations should be more open and acknowledge the existence of racism among healthcare providers and educators, working to educate and support all members of their programs.
I am sure if this dispute were to be resolved, many Saudi trainees would continue working and learning as diligently and professionally as before—but will they feel as safe and welcomed as before?
References
- Bureau, S.A.C. Postgraduate Medical Program in Canada. [cited 2018; Available from: https://www.saudibureau.org/en/inside.php?ID=17.
- College, R. International collaboration. [cited 2018; Available from: http://www.royalcollege.ca/rcsite/publications/ar-section5-e.
- Khan, M.H., N. Abdullah, and M.B. Stanbrook, Withdrawal of Saudi trainees exposes vulnerability of Canadian health care. Canadian Medical Association Journal, 2018.
- McManus, I.C., Factors affecting likelihood of applicants being offered a place in medical schools in the United Kingdom in 1996 and 1997: retrospective study. BMJ, 1998. 317(7166): p. 1111-6; discussion 1116-7.
- Cohen, J.S. and S. Patten, Well-being in residency training: a survey examining resident physician satisfaction both within and outside of residency training and mental health in Alberta. BMC Med Educ, 2005. 5: p. 21.
GC
I would like to remind you that there are enough International Medical Graduates able to cover those services that Saudi physicians and surgeons have been responsible for. A vast majority of these physicians ARE Canadian citizens deprived of the chance to validate their credentials and join the workforce. While we continue selling the training positions to the highest payer and jeopardizing Canadian health care, these CANADIAN physicians are driving cabs or stocking shelves at Walmart.
Canadians responsible for delivering health care to Canadians, isn’t that how it is supposed to be?
Nada
I agree with you as racism exist for a big time but canadians do not show it up but it is clear especially in Qubec. May Not originally Canadians, I had more conflicts with people immigrants from indea or Pakistan for example.
And yes education therir is good but saudi trainee level is extremely excellent as well if I compare, physicians who were exposed to Canadian or American system should invest snd improve local programs and hopefully the Goverment won’t require scholarship to get the job. Our programs are depreciated with waste of a lot of money!!!
gordon friesen
Dear Bader,
It is indeed unfortunate that highly skilled and motivated individuals should suddenly be caught, and penalized, in a collective dispute between two societies.
And as long as you stick to arguments of that nature, you are certain to encounter a sympathetic audience.
However, in addressing the question of Canadian racism, you are actually litigating the underlying social dispute, and that, I assure you, can not possibly go well.
Canada has a system of laws which is explicitly egalitarian, for all people, regardless of race, sex, etc. etc. Therefore, racism in Canada is systematically repressed. Moreover, you are obviously aware of the powerful anti-racist climate in Canada, because you clearly feel confident in exploiting the collective sense of guilt and confusion resulting from the ambiguous relation of modern Canadians to their past. In other words, you depend on the non-racist bias of Canadians to carry your point.
Saudi Arabia, on the other hand, has an archaic tyrannical system, where there are no real legal protections for anybody. There is no freedom of speech or religion. There is no significant immigration. Foreign workers of professional status must follow strict rules, of an apartheid nature, in order to protect them from the locals and the locals (culturally) from them. Guest workers in menial roles are treated like slaves. Little boys, deliberately stunted in growth are recruited and raised to race camels. More books are translated into Spanish in one year than the entire number of books ever translated into Arabic since that language has existed in written form. And women are … well, let’s not even go there.
The point is, our Prime Minister said some unflattering things about your home society. Saudi authorities, quite naturally, refused to be criticized in that way. Reprisals and counter-reprisals have been taken, including, sadly, sanctions applied to Saudi students. But the problem is not racism, in Canada, for heaven’s sake.
Feel the Love,
Gordon from Montreal
Donald Prior
It is unfortunate that his writer is pulling “The Racism Card” out in this discussion. Disagreements between different ethnic groups are predominantly unassociated with racist bias. They may reflect cultural differences that improve with education, difficulties in learning by constructive criticism and feeling vulnerable when no vulnerability exists.
I have had the pleasure to work with healthcare workers from a variety of cultures and when disagreements occur, discussing the issues with an open mind have allowed for resolution without crying racism.
I am a white Anglo-Saxon who now lives as a visible minority in a nonwhite large GTA urban community. I am, aware of the rare prejudices exhibited by the visible majority against me; however, it demeans those individuals, not me. I experience far more positive interactions with the visible majority than these few demeaning individuals exhibit.